论文部分内容阅读
看了《比较与超越——让还原与比较的写作策略舒展写作的教学魅力》(以下简称《比较》,《语文学习》2007年第11期)一文,惊讶于其不但观点荒谬,而且有多处硬伤,笔者如鲠在喉,不吐不快。一、误用“证伪”概念“……我们却忽略了另一种操作方法:可以把优秀的作文还原成原初并不优秀的作文,然后再从动态生成优秀作文的角度,对这些作文是怎样从优秀到不优秀、再由不优秀到优秀进行全程的思维与方法追踪。当前把优秀作文还原到不优
After reading the article “Comparing and Transcending—Let the writing strategies of restoring and comparing stretch the teaching charm of writing” (hereinafter referred to as “Comparative”, “Language Learning”, No.11, 2007), I was amazed at the fact that it was not only absurd but also Injury at the office, the author, such as lying in the throat, do not spit unpleasant. First, misuse ”falsification “ concept ”...... We have neglected another operation method: You can restore excellent essays to original essays that are not excellent, and then from the perspective of dynamically generating excellent essays, These essays are how to track from the best to the worst, and from the best to the best.