论文部分内容阅读
最高人民检察院于1998年6月3日通过的《人民检察院复查刑事申诉案件规定》第十六条规定:“人民检察院对有下列情形的刑事申诉,应当立案复查:……(二)原处理决定、判决或裁定有错误可能的;……”第十七条规定中,对“原处理决定、判决或裁定有错误可能”即原处理结果有错误可能的六种具体情形进行了描述。其中,第一、二种情形即申诉人提出了可能改变院处理决定的新的事实或者证据的以及据以定案的证据不够确实,充分或者证明案件事实的主要证据之间存在矛盾的情形,归纳起来即可能存在事实可认定错误的情形。本文从这两种情形入手,对事实认定错误可能进行深入具体的剖析,以便今后更好的把握刑事申诉案件的立案条件。
Article 16 of the Provisions of the People’s Procuratorate on Reexamination of Criminal Appeal Procedures passed by the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on June 3, 1998 stipulates: “People’s procuratorates shall review cases of criminal appeals in the following circumstances: (2) The original treatment Decision, ruling or ruling may be wrong; ... ”Article 17 of the Provisions“ may have been incorrect in handling the original decision, verdict or ruling. ”That is, the six specific situations in which the result of the original treatment was erroneous were investigated. description. Among them, the first and second situations are: the claimant has put forward the new facts or evidences that may change the decision of the court and the contradiction between the evidence of the confirmation and the main evidence of the facts of the case is not conclusive There may be circumstances in which the facts may be mistaken. Starting from these two situations, this article may make an in-depth and detailed analysis of the factual identification errors in order to better grasp the conditions for filing criminal appeals in the future.