论文部分内容阅读
基于对以信念概念为核心的常识心理学的不同解释,消除主义代表人物丘奇兰德与反消除主义代表人物戴维森、邓尼特以及福多等人进行了激烈的哲学论争。前者主张信念是一个没有意义的、不正确的、过时的哲学概念,信念乃至常识心理学应该予以消除;后者则认为前者的攻击无的放矢,常识心理学是规范和抽象的,因而是免于经验检验的。事实上,信念概念的本体论证明不应该纠缠于常识心理学这一局部的前科学理论,而应回归信念这一全局的抽象概念本身;信念概念之所以是不可消除的,乃是因为对于人类主体的能动性与求知行为而言,它是不可或缺的。
Based on the different interpretations of common-sense psychology with the concept of belief as the core, Churchill Rand, the representative of eliminationist, and Davidson, Dennett and Fado, representatives of anti-eliminationists, conducted fierce philosophical debates. The former advocates that faith is a meaningless, incorrect, outdated philosophy, belief and even common sense psychology should be eliminated; the latter is that the former attack-oriented, common-sense psychology is normative and abstract, and thus is exempt from experience Inspection. In fact, the ontological proof of the concept of belief should not be entangled in the local pre-scientific theory of common-sense psychology but should be returned to the global concept of abstract itself; the concept of belief can not be eliminated, It is indispensable for the motivation and curiosity of the subject.