受理涉外仲裁协议纠纷案件并对仲裁协议的效力进行判定,是一国司法对国际仲裁实施监督的重要途径,但相对于仲裁协议当事人的自治权和仲裁机构的自裁权而言,司法的管辖具有“剩余权”属性。调整涉外仲裁协议的准据法主要是当事人选择的法律或仲裁地法,加之公共秩序保留制度使法院地利益最终得以保障,仲裁协议冲突规范中的“法院地”连结点已失其必要性。对于国际仲裁协议而言,“法院地法”主要表现为法院地的仲裁法,其谦抑性应得到立法和司法的保障,不适当地干预仲裁协议的效力会损及国际商事仲裁的统一运行体制。法院地法的“谦抑性”与司法对仲裁协议的“剩余权”具有一致性,我国司法对涉外仲裁协议亦应本着谦抑性原则限制法院地法的不当干预。 Accepting cases of dispute over foreign arbitration agreements and judging the validity of arbitration agreements are important ways for a country to exercise judicial supervision over international arbitrations. However, compared with the autonomy of arbitration parties and the arbitral authority, judicial jurisdiction has “Residuals ” attribute. The law governing the foreign-related arbitration agreement is mainly the law or the law of arbitration chosen by the parties. In addition, the system of preserving the public order ultimately guarantees the interests of the court, and the “ground” link in the conflict of arbitration agreement is no longer necessary Sex. For the international arbitration agreement, “Court ” mainly manifested in the courts of arbitration law, its modesty should be protected by legislation and justice, improper interference with the effectiveness of arbitration agreements will damage the international commercial arbitration Unified operating system. The “modesty and restraint” of the court ’s law and the judiciary have consistency with the “right of redundancy” of the arbitration agreement. Our country’ s judicial arbitration agreement concerning foreign affairs should also restrict the improper intervention of the court ’s law in the modest and conciliatory principle.