实践的社会性问题是当前哲学研究的生长点傅国强实践既有客观性、又有主体性，还有社会性。实践的客观性本质上是指，实践所改造的对象是物质的，它所依据的规律性内容是客观存在的。实践的主体性主要是指实践主体为实践对象、手段、过程和结果等方面所唤起的全部精神内容以及主体的各种能力在实践的作用和影响。实践的社会性从根本上说，是指特定实践对社会的适应性或社会对它的接受性。客观性、主体性和社会性内在于实践过程，决定了人类实践活动的特殊本质。抽掉客观性，只承认主体性，就等于把人变成神，把人类生产实践看作是上帝凭观念创造世界。只承认客观性，把客观性推向极端，否认实践的主体性也是错误的。忽视实践的社会性，只强调它的客观性和主体性，也不符合马克思主义。马克思对实践观的伟大功绩在于，他通过对现实的确切理解和把握，在思想理论上把实践的客观性、主体性和社会性有机地统一起来，实现了哲学观的全面变革，创立了科学的实践观。我国哲学界对马克思主义实践观的研究不断深化和发展，从前，为了避免主观主义和唯心主义嫌疑，过多关注实践的客观性，忽略了实践的主体性。８０年代以来，有了重大转机，突出地研究了实践的主体性问题。然而实践的社会性问题至今没引起人们普遍 Practical social problems is the growth point of the current philosophical research Fu Guoqiang practice both objective, subjectivity, as well as social. The objectivity of practice essentially means that the object transformed by practice is material and the regular content on which it is based is objective. The subjectivity of practice refers mainly to the fact that all the spiritual content aroused by the practical subject for the practical object, means, process and result, and the various functions of the subject in practice have an effect on the practice. Fundamentally, practice refers to the social practice of a particular practice of social adaptation or social acceptance of it. Objectivity, subjectivity and sociality are inherent in the process of practice, which determine the special nature of human practice. Removing objectivity and recognizing subjectivity only means turning people into gods and seeing human production practices as God’s creation of the world by virtue of ideas. Only admit objectivity, push objectivity to the extreme, deny the subjectivity of practice is wrong. Ignoring the sociality of practice, it only emphasizes its objectivity and subjectivity and does not conform to Marxism. Marx’s great contribution to the concept of practice lies in his organically unifying the objectivity, subjectivity and sociality of practice in his ideological theory through the exact understanding and grasping of reality, realizing the complete transformation of philosophy and establishing science The concept of practice. In the past, in order to avoid the suspicion of subjectivism and idealism, the philosophical circles of our country have been deepening and developing the study of the Marxist practice view. In the past, they paid too much attention to the objectivity of practice and neglected the subjectivity of practice. Since the 1980s, there has been a major turn for the better in studying the subjectivity of practice. However, the practice of social issues has not caused widespread