两个证据规定创制了中国独特的可补正的排除规则,它既是保障证据真实性、减少冤假错案之刑事政策的需求,也体现了立法对中国目前侦查活动的特殊关照,是一种基于现实主义考量的妥协产物。但由于可补正的排除规则充斥着实体真实主义的色彩,其补正的范围没有得到适当的限制,补正的方法在逻辑层面上也存在值得反思之处,需要进一步的司法解释予以完善。 Both evidences provide for the creation of a unique exclusionary rule that can be amended in China. It not only serves the requirement of safeguarding the authenticity of evidence and reducing the criminal policies of unjustly wrongful and wrong cases, but also reflects the special care given by the legislation to the current investigation activities in China. It is a reality- The compromise of doctrine. However, because the exclusionary rules that can be corrected are full of the color of substantive realism, the scope of the correction is not properly restricted. The correction method also has something worth reflecting on the logic level and needs further judicial interpretation to be perfected.