论文部分内容阅读
传统语法对“V了”存现句和领主句的认识,停留在二者线性顺序上的一致而忽略了二者在层级结构方面的不同。基于高位和低位引元结构理论对两类句型的重新分析,不仅揭示出二者句首名词与动词之间语义关联的性质不同,而且也剖析了二者内部构造方面的差异:引元语素“了”引入题元角色为方所的论元时形成高位引元结构,进而生成“V了”存现句,而引元语素“了”引入题元角色为领有者的论元时形成低位引元结构,进而生成领主句。两种句型句法构造的层级性差异也因之而得以解释。
The traditional grammar of the “V ” existential sentence and the main leader of the sentence, stay in the linear order of the two consistent and ignore the two in the hierarchical differences. The re-analysis of the two types of sentence patterns based on the theory of high and low levels of the notion reveals not only the different nature of the semantic association between the two nouns and the verbs, but also the differences in their internal structures: “A ” introduces a high-level elemental structure when it is introduced as an argument of a square, and then generates a “V ” existing sentence while a meta-morpheme "introduced When the argument of the formation of low lead element structure, and then generate the main clause. The hierarchical differences between the syntactic constructions of the two types of sentences are also explained.