论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析经腹彩超与经阴道彩超在异位妊娠诊断中的应用价值。方法选取2009年3月至2012年11月在泌阳县人民医院接受治疗的90例异位妊娠患者,随机把患者平均分成对照组和观察组(每组45例)。对两组患者的彩超诊断符合率进行对比分析。结果对照组45例患者中,诊断符合率为75.56%(34/45);观察组45例患者中诊断符合率为93.33%(42/45)。两组患者彩超诊断符合率差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中经阴道检查患者的平均诊断时间明显少于对照组。结论经腹部彩超检查与经阴道彩超检查相比,经阴道彩超检查对移位妊娠的定位更加准确诊断符合率更高,其平均诊断时间更短,值得临床推广。
Objective To comparatively analyze the value of transabdominal ultrasonography and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Methods 90 cases of ectopic pregnancy treated in Biyang County People’s Hospital from March 2009 to November 2012 were randomly divided into control group and observation group (45 cases in each group). The coincidence rates of color Doppler ultrasound diagnosis of two groups of patients were compared. Results Among the 45 patients in the control group, the diagnostic coincidence rate was 75.56% (34/45). The diagnostic coincidence rate in the 45 patients in the observation group was 93.33% (42/45). The coincidence rate of color Doppler ultrasound diagnosis between the two groups showed significant difference (P <0.05), and the mean time of diagnosis by vaginal examination was significantly less than that of the control group. Conclusion Compared with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography, transrectal ultrasound examination is more accurate in diagnosing transplanted pregnancy. The coincidence rate is higher and the average diagnosis time is shorter, which is worthy of clinical promotion.