《石油政工研究》编辑部: 2003年第一期《石油政工研究》刊登了《群众利益最关情》一文。文章总的看是好的,但是仍然没有摆脱“事迹材料”的窠臼,缺乏研究的深度。 《群众利益最关情》这类文章,上报纸比较合适,它反映的、重视的是“情况”,而我们的刊物则关注的是对情况的研究,不仅反映“怎么样”,更应关注“为什么”。只有把“为什么”讲清了,才有启发和借鉴价值。在关注群众利益问 “Petroleum Politics Research” Editorial Department: The first issue of 2003 “Petroleum Politics Research” published a “interest of the masses most concern” article. The article is generally good, but still not out of the stereotype of “deeds and materials”, the lack of depth of research. Articles like “The Most Interests of the Masses” are more suitable for newspapers. What they reflect is “the situation”, while our publications focus on the study of the situation, which not only reflects the “how” but rather the concern “why”. Only the “why” made it clear, only to inspire and learn from the value. Concerned about the interests of the masses asked