论文部分内容阅读
根据商标权人丙企业举报,A市工商局在依法调查本地甲企业涉嫌销售商标侵权案时发现,甲企业销售的商品生产地标注为B市,乙企业的涉嫌侵权商品与C市丙企业生产的商品类似且使用的商标近似,容易构成混淆、误导消费者。因甲企业能提供合法进货凭证说明进货来源,A市工商局责令甲企业改正,并根据《商标法实施条例》依法将案情通报给涉嫌侵权商品供应商D市批发企业丁所在地的工商局,D市工商局在调查
According to the proprietorship of trademark proprietor A, A City Bureau of Industry and Commerce in accordance with the law of local enterprises suspected of selling a trademark infringement case found that a business sales of goods marked as B City, B enterprises alleged infringement of goods and C City C production enterprises Similar to and similar to the trademark used, likely to constitute confusion and mislead the consumer. Because A enterprise can provide a legal purchase certificate to explain the purchase source, A City Bureau of Commerce and Industry ordered a correction, and according to the “Trademark Law Enforcement Regulations” to inform the case of suspected infringing goods suppliers D City wholesale business Ding location A, D City of Industry and Commerce in the investigation