论文部分内容阅读
本文在评述秦岭造山带的地质研究史后认为,大多数中外学者赞成它是一个经过加里东和海西期多旋回的印支造山带。但作者不赞成华北与华南地块在前泥盆纪就已碰撞的见解,而同意把秦岭视为与阿尔卑斯山类似的碰撞型造山带,自晚古生代到晚三叠世其活动达到高峰.文中指出,秦岭带明显的走向滑动运动可以使其构造成分重新分布,以致必须慎重对待被走滑牵引的碎裂岩块,甚至整个地体中得到的同位素和古生物年龄的解释.作者认为,即使对所有缝合线火山筑积物进行逐级和分组的详细研究,仍然可能得出错误的认识,强调剖面地质工作对研究造山带演化的重要意义.
After reviewing the history of geological research in the Qinling orogenic belt, this paper argues that most Chinese and foreign scholars agree that it is an Indosinian orogenic belt that has been cycled more than the Caledonian and Hercynian cycles. However, the author disagree with the opinion that the North China and South China blocks had collided in the Pre-Devonian, and agree to consider the Qinling as a collision-type orogenic belt similar to the Alps, with its peak in activity from the Late Paleozoic to the Late Triassic. It is pointed out that the obvious strike-slip movement in the Qinling belt can redistribute its tectonic components so that the interpretation of age of isotopes and paleontology obtained by slippage of cataclastic rocks and even the entire terrain must be treated with caution. A detailed study of all suture volcanic blocks by level and grouping may still lead to misconceptions, emphasizing the importance of section geology in studying the evolution of the orogenic belt.