笔者常听到一些同志抱怨,“我写的几篇文章,自我感觉挺好,投稿却一篇也未被采用,那编辑们也真是……”,“××杂志发表的某某文章还不如我那“次品”呢……”。这里存在着一个对文章的评价问题。由于编者、作者和读者所处的地位、环境和专业知识水平不同,以致同一篇论文,在作者看来,认为不错,编者的看法则未必如此,同样的道理,编者看中并编发的文章,读者也不一定全都欢迎。同时,由于人的某种天性,有些作者不免过于偏爱自己的作品,以致在多次投稿不中的情况下,出现某种抱怨情 I often hear some comrades complain, “I wrote a few articles, I feel very good, but one has not been used in submissions, that editors are really ...”, “XX magazine published a certain article is not as good as My ”defective“ ... ”. There is a question of evaluation of the article here. Due to the different positions of editors, authors and readers, the different levels of environment and professional knowledge, the same essay is considered to be a good essay in the opinion of the author. This is not necessarily the opinion of the editors. The same reason, editors’ fancy and compiled articles, Readers are not necessarily all welcome. At the same time, due to some nature of human beings, some authors can not help but favor their work so much that in the case of multiple submissions, some grudges appear