《文史知识》2002年11期刊载了一篇《“三皇五帝”的考古学文化》,开头便说:“20世纪30年代,中国史学界崛起了一个‘古史辨’派,其中最著名的一个观点就是‘大禹是条虫’,从而引起了一场旷日持久的论战。当时中国史学界的有名人物几乎都卷进了这场论战中,最终形成了煌煌七巨册的《古史辨》一书。那么,大禹或简称‘禹’究竟是否存在,他是一个人名,还是一个氏族的名称,以及他建立的夏朝是否存在,抑或只是一 ”Literature and history knowledge“ 2002-11 published a ”three“ Five Emperors ”archeology culture“, beginning: ”" In the 1930s, Chinese historians have risen a group of ’ancient history discrimination’, the most The famous view was that ’Dayu was a worm’, which triggered a protracted debate when almost all the famous figures in Chinese historiography were involved in this polemic, culminating in the ancient book Whether or not ’Yu’ actually exists, whether he is a person’s name or a clan’s name, and whether the Xia Dynasty he founded exists or is only one