哲学语词被Wittgenstein等哲学家视为日常语言的畸变使用,是空洞的,应带回到日常的用法中去。本文考察哲学语词的逻辑地位或结构,包括哲学语词的认知基础、哲学语词的言说对象、哲学语词涉及的言语行为、哲学语词的义务内容等,以期证明哲学语词本来具有的合理地位。 Philosophical terms, used by philosophers such as Wittgenstein as distorted uses of everyday language, are hollow and should be brought back to everyday usage. This paper examines the logical position or structure of philosophical terms, including the cognitive basis of philosophical terms, the phrasing objects of philosophical terms, the speech acts involved in philosophical terms and the obligatory content of philosophical terms in order to prove the reasonable status that philosophical terms originally had.