论文部分内容阅读
编辑与作者之间有“异”有“同”，其“异”是绝对的，“同”是相对的。不认识二者之间的“异”与“同”，就不能真正地处理好二者之间的关系。“同”虽然是相对的，但它是编辑和作者二者之间的最佳境界。没有二者之间的“同”，编辑实践中的许多问题就难以妥善地解决。在实际工作中以“同”为前提与以“异”为前提有很大的不同。要使编辑与作者二者之间从“异”到“同”，最重要的一点就是防止单一化的倾向。目标虽然是一致的，但求“同”的途径和方法却是多种多样的，应作全方位的多方面的努力才能奏效。
There are “different” and “same” between the editor and the author, the “different” is absolute, “the same” is relative. If we do not understand the differences and the sameness between the two, we can not really handle the relationship between the two. Although “the same” is relative, it is the best state between the editor and the author. Without the “sameness” between the two, many problems in the editing practice can not be properly solved. In the actual work to “the same” as the premise and “different” as the premise is very different. To make the difference between editors and writers from “different” to “same”, the most important point is to prevent the trend of simplification. Although the goals are the same, the ways and means of seeking the “same” are varied and should be made in all aspects and in all aspects.