论文部分内容阅读
在法治不彰,司法没有终极效力之时,信访救济的存在无疑具有一定的制度合理性。目前信访救济是我国处于由“政”治型国家向“法”治型国家转变的过程中的特定时期的产物。引发涉诉信访的原因是多方面的,既有国家政策体制的问题,也有信访人的、司法人员、历史、时代的因素,但信访暴露了我们这个社会的弊端,促使我们积极的解决问题。虽然涉诉信访给我们带来了这样那样的不良影响,但任何一个事物都是辩证的,它对于促进我们国家社会发展起到了极大地促进作用。同时它是历史的产物,随着我国法治进程的进一步发展,立法的完善,司法人员素质的提高,民众法律意识的提高,司法效率和质量的提高,涉诉信访必将退出历史的舞台。
In the absence of the rule of law, the judiciary does not have the ultimate effect, the existence of petition relief undoubtedly has some institutional rationality. The current petition relief is the product of our country in a specific period of transition from a “political” state to a “legal” state-controlled country. There are many reasons for the petition letters and visits, including the problems of the state policy system as well as the petitioners, the judicial officers, the history and the times. However, petitions exposed the shortcomings of our society and prompted us to actively solve the problems. Although petition letters and calls have brought us this kind of adverse effects, but everything is a dialectical, it has played a significant role in promoting the social development of our country. At the same time, it is a product of history. With the further development of the rule of law in our country, the improvement of legislation, the improvement of the quality of judicial personnel, the improvement of people’s legal awareness, the improvement of judicial efficiency and quality, petitions for letters and calls will surely withdraw from the stage of history.