论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对1960年代历史小说语境化“重返”式的解读,运用“知识考古学”的研究方法,分析1960年代的历史小说表达了作家们在向历史诉求的过程中与小说中的历史人物彼此生死相知,以及他们对现实的介入性言说,而这种面向历史的精神旨归和介入现实的话语呈现,又隐约地透露出作家在现实规训下的复杂心态,1960年代的历史小说也成了意识形态与政治话语诉求的认识性装置,从一个侧面显示了权力、制度、意识形态等对文学与人的规训以及这种规训的隐秘成规。
By analyzing the contextualization and “returning to” of the historical novels of the 1960s and using the research methods of “knowledge archeology”, this essay analyzes the historical novels in the 1960s and expresses the differences between the writers’ The historical figures in the novel, each other, are known for their life and death, and their intervenient speech on the reality. However, this historical orientation toward the spirit and the discourse involved in the reality are presented, and the complicated psychology of the writer under the reality of discipline is revealed vaguely. 1960 The historical novels of the age have also become the recognizable devices for the ideological and political discourse demands. From one aspect, they show the discipline of literature and human being, such as power, system and ideology, and the secrets of such discipline.