论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:一个月前,我与男友决定结婚。因彼此家庭都不富裕,自己也没太多积蓄,就想到花些小钱,去一家规模不大的影楼租赁婚纱举行婚礼。不料婚礼之后,我却染上了皮肤病,并花去2700余元医疗费。原来是影楼没有对经常使用的婚纱做消毒处理,导致婚纱内细菌严重超标所致。面对我的索赔要求,影楼业主却断然拒绝,理由是:“租赁不等于买卖,租赁合同自然也就不等于消费合同,我不能因为婚纱卫生不合格,而享有作为消费者具有的索赔权。”请问:影楼的说法对吗?
Editor’s Comrade: A month ago, my husband and I decided to get married. Because each family are not rich, not too much savings, they think of spending some money, go to a small wedding photo studio rental wedding. Unexpectedly, after the wedding, I have contracted dermatosis and spent more than 2,700 yuan on medical expenses. The original studio is not done on the regular use of the wedding to do disinfection, resulting in serious wedding exceeded the bacteria caused. Faced with my claim, the studio owners categorically rejected: “Leasing is not equal to the sale, the lease contract is not equal to the consumer contract, I can not because of wedding unqualified, and enjoy the right to claim as consumers . ”Excuse me: studio is correct?