论文部分内容阅读
本文重点关注转型期民营企业在卷入商业纠纷时如何选择纠纷解决机制,以及企业家政治身份和制度环境的影响差异。利用全国民营企业抽样调查数据实证发现,企业选择的纠纷解决途径是多元化的,其中有政治关系的企业更愿意诉诸“法院仲裁”和“政府渠道”的国家解纷机制;在更“差”的环境中,有政治关系的企业更倾向于选择法律诉讼而非寻求政府渠道。此外,政治关系有助于提升纠纷解决的事后满意度,而且在“差”制度下,这种影响更大。
This article focuses on how the private-owned enterprises choose dispute resolution mechanisms in the process of their involvement in business disputes, as well as the differences in the influence of entrepreneur’s political status and institutional environment. Using the sample survey data of private enterprises in our country, it is found that the way of dispute resolution is diversified. Enterprises with political relations are more willing to resort to state dispute resolution mechanisms such as “court arbitration” and “government channel” In a more “poor” environment, companies with political connections are more inclined to choose legal proceedings than seek government access. In addition, political relations help improve post-factum satisfaction in dispute resolution, and the impact is greater under the “poor ” system.