论文部分内容阅读
目的:对热放疗、放化疗和单纯放疗治疗食管癌的临床效果进行比较分析。方法:随机选取食管癌患者90例,将其随机分为热放疗组、放化疗组和单纯放疗组各30例。对放疗组中食管癌患者采取单纯放疗,对放化疗组中患者采取放疗及化疗治疗,对热放疗组中患者采取放疗后进行热疗治疗。对三组食管癌患者的临床疗效进行比较分析。结果:单纯放疗组总有效率为56.67%,放化疗组总有效率为86.68%,热放疗组总有效率为76.67%,即相对于放疗组以及热疗组,放化疗组中的食管癌患者的近期临床治疗效果更为良好,但是其不良反应更为严重(P<0.05)。结论:在对食管癌患者进行治疗时,采取热放疗、放化疗以及单纯放疗治疗均有一定的治疗效果,而相对于放疗以及热疗,放化疗治疗的近期疗效更佳,但其不良反应更为严重。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of thermal radiotherapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and radiotherapy alone on esophageal cancer. Methods: Ninety patients with esophageal cancer were randomly selected and randomly divided into heat radiotherapy group, radiotherapy and chemotherapy group and radiotherapy alone group. In the radiotherapy group, patients with esophageal cancer were treated with radiotherapy alone, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and radiotherapy with radiotherapy after radiotherapy. The clinical efficacy of three groups of esophageal cancer patients were compared. Results: The total effective rate was 56.67% in radiotherapy alone group, 86.68% in radiotherapy and chemotherapy group, and 76.67% in radiotherapy and radiotherapy group, which was significantly higher than that in radiotherapy group, hyperthermia group and esophageal cancer patients The recent clinical treatment is more effective, but its adverse reactions are more serious (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer, the use of thermal radiotherapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and radiotherapy alone have a certain effect, and compared to radiotherapy and hyperthermia, radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment of the recent efficacy is better, but the adverse reactions more Serious.