论文部分内容阅读
此文是关于浙江省宁波市勤勇村的个案研究~([1])。勤勇村作为毛时代“农业学大寨”的样板村庄,因其自然景观以及保存下来的建于毛时代的房屋而闻名遐迩。在中央政府颁布的一系列关于历史文化村镇保护的规定中,没有一条涉及毛时代社会主义的模范村庄。这些当年的样板乡村的建筑环境,部分得以在政治经济变动中保留下来,是否具有保护价值?他们中又蕴含了什么样的建筑哲学?本研究聚焦于勤勇村的规划和建筑,通过历史分析和田野考察,清晰地展示了20世纪70至90年代乡村住房建筑的转变脉络。我们也希望通过对勤勇村历史和现状的分析,为中国农村地区乡村建筑文化的保护带来一些启示。
This article is a case study of Qinyong Village, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province ~ ([1]). Qin Yong village as the Mao era “Agriculture learn Dazhai ” model village, because of its natural landscape and the preservation of the house built in the era of Mao is famous. In the series of regulations promulgated by the Central Government on the protection of historical, cultural and rural townships, none of them touched upon the model village of socialism in Mao’s era. What kind of philosophy of architecture do they contain? The present study focuses on the planning and construction of Qinyong village. Through historical analysis, And fieldwork clearly demonstrated the changing context of rural housing construction during the 1970s and 1990s in the 20th century. We also hope that by analyzing the history and current situation of Qinyong Village, we can bring some enlightenment for the protection of rural architectural culture in rural China.