在刑事案件的法庭审理过程中,辩护律师经常认为卷宗材料不够客观、全面,而进行一些调查取证,尔后在法庭开庭审理时当庭请求宣读提供所收集的证据材料。对于此项请求,当今审判实践通常有允许、不允许和有条件允许三种做法。允许者认为,同意此项请求有助于法庭查明案件事实。不允许者认为,律师当庭要求宣读并提供证据材料,法律并无此项专门规定,故而一概不允许。有条件允许者认为律师所要宣读并提供的证据材料,应当在庭前交法庭审查过,如与起诉书认定的事实有重大 In court proceedings in criminal cases, defense counsel often think the files are not sufficiently objective and comprehensive and carry out some investigation and evidence collection. Later, they asked to read out the evidence materials collected during court hearings. There are usually three types of trial practice currently permitted for this request: disallowed and conditional. Permissioners believe that agreeing to this request will help the court to ascertain the facts of the case. Permission is not allowed, lawyers in court asked to read and provide evidence, the law does not have this special provisions, and therefore not be allowed. Conditional permission that the lawyers to read out and provide evidence of materials should be submitted to the court before the court examined, as evidenced by the fact that the indictment is significant