论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨两镜联合治疗输卵管性不孕的疗效。方法 252例输卵管性不孕患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各126例。观察组接受腹腔镜联合宫腔镜治疗,对照组仅采用宫腔镜治疗。比较两组手术时间、出血量、住院时间及临床疗效。结果两组手术时间、出血量、住院时间等指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后输卵管复通率高于对照组(P<0.01),两组随访妊娠率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜联合宫腔镜治疗输卵管性不孕疗效显著,可提高输卵管复通率,值得推广。
Objective To investigate the curative effect of two-mirror combined treatment of tubal infertility. Methods 252 cases of tubal infertility were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each 126 cases. The observation group received laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy, while the control group only treated with hysteroscopy. The operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in operative time, bleeding volume and length of hospital stay between the two groups (P> 0.05). The tubal recanalization rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.01) Statistical difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopic treatment of tubal infertility significant effect, can improve the tubal rate of recanalization, it is worth promoting.