论文部分内容阅读
入世催生中国的反垄断法。中国正在制定的反垄断法,充分借鉴和吸收了外国反垄断法的实体内容,然而在程序方面则规定得比较笼统,可操作性不强。各国反垄断立法模式虽然不同,但是有一个共同点,即集实体法与程序法于一身。这是因为对损害竞争案件的查处,需要特定的程序和方法,甚至有关程序的条文在反垄断法中占有相当的篇幅。此外,反垄断执法机关不同于一般的行政机关和司法机关,其权限及办案规则与程序等必须在专门的法律中予以明确。笔者认为,我们应当充分意识到我国重实体轻程序的立法传统及其危害后果,加强我国反垄断法程序方面的立法,才能保障中国反垄断法的有效实施,达到预期的目标。
China’s Anti-Monopoly Law Enters into WTO. The antitrust law that China is enacting fully draws on and assimilates the substance of the foreign antitrust laws, however, the procedural aspects of the antitrust law are rather general and the operability is not strong. Although the antitrust legislative model varies from country to country, it has one thing in common: the substantive law and procedural law. This is because the investigation of damage to competition cases requires specific procedures and methods. Even the provisions of the relevant procedures occupy a considerable space in antitrust law. In addition, the antitrust law enforcement agencies are different from the general administrative organs and judicial organs. Their authority, handling rules and procedures must be clearly defined in specific laws. The author believes that we should be fully aware of the legislative tradition of our country’s heavy and light procedures and its harmful consequences, and to strengthen our legislation on antitrust procedures in order to guarantee the effective implementation of China’s antitrust law and achieve the desired goals.