举证时限制度作为民事证据的一项基本制度,有利于诉讼证明任务的完成和举证责任的落实,有利于程序公正的实现,有利于诉讼效率和效益的提高及程序的安定。综观中外举证时限制度的有关规定,其既有共同之处,也存在明显差异。我们需要在总结司法实践经验的基础上,借鉴两大法系的有效做法,进一步完善我国的举证时限制度。 As a basic system of civil evidence, the time limit of evidence is conducive to the completion of litigation proving tasks and the implementation of the burden of proof, is conducive to the realization of procedural fairness, is conducive to the improvement of litigation efficiency and effectiveness and the stability of the procedure. Looking at the relevant provisions of the time limit system of evidence in China and foreign countries has its own commonalities and obvious differences. We need to draw lessons from the effective practices of the two major legal systems on the basis of summing up the judicial experience and further improve the time limit of evidence in our country.