论文部分内容阅读
学生作文教师改,这是传统作法。但是,这样改弊端有三:一是教师费时费心费力多。如果都要精批细改,教师的整个身心就被作文束缚住了。这样,就必然会挤掉钻研教材、探究教法的时间。二是收效甚微。尽管教师改作文付出了繁重的劳动,但是学生未必完全理解你的用意,特别是有的学生看了分数和批语就万事大吉了,学生究竟收益多少?不少教师都深有体会:徒劳无功。三是不能充分调动学生的学习主动积极性,培养自己改
Student composition teacher change, this is the traditional practice. However, this has three disadvantages: First, time-consuming and laborious teachers. If you have to fine fine change, the teacher's whole body and mind is bound by the composition of the living. In this way, it is bound to squeeze out teaching materials to explore the time of teaching. Second, with little success. In spite of the heavy workload of teachers changing the essay, students may not fully understand your intention. In particular, some students may have trouble reading scores and criticisms. What are the students' benefits? Many teachers are deeply acquainted with it: futility. Third, students can not fully mobilize the initiative to learn, develop their own reform