论文部分内容阅读
本文结合国际商事仲裁的一般理论与实践,特别是我国现行仲裁立法与实践,论述了非内国仲裁项下的浮动裁决与《纽约公约》项下的非本国裁决的性质,指出了两者之间的本质区别。作者认为,非内国仲裁是国际商事仲裁的一种虚拟理论,其核心内容是国际商事仲裁裁决的法律效力不必由仲裁地国的法律赋予,任何国家法院均无权撤销此裁决。而《纽约公约》项下的非本国裁决则有其特定的含义,它是指裁决地与裁决执行地同属一个国家的情形:法院根据当地法律认为在法院地国作出的裁决不是当地的裁决,即非本国裁决。非内国仲裁项下的裁决为浮动裁决或者无国籍裁决,而《纽约公约》项下的非本国裁决则不是无国籍裁决,因为按照《纽约公约》的规定,不是裁决地国法院无权撤销此裁决,而是裁决地和执行地国法院根据当地的法律不认为此裁决是当地裁决,因而拒绝对此裁决行使撤销权。当此裁决向此裁决地和执行地国以外的《纽约公约》缔约国法院申请承认与执行时,后者仍然会根据《纽约公约》的规定,将此裁决认定为在裁决地国作出的“外国裁决”。旭普林公司向我国法院申请执行的ICC裁决,是ICC仲裁庭适用ICC规则在我国上海作出的裁决,此裁决对于我国而言,根据我国现行法律不是我国裁决,按照《纽约公约》的规定也不是外国裁决,而是《纽约公约》项下的非本国裁决。
Based on the general theory and practice of international commercial arbitration, especially the current legislation and practice of arbitration in our country, this paper discusses the floating ruling under non-domestic arbitration and the nature of non-domestic ruling under New York Convention, The essential difference. The author believes that non-domestic arbitration is a kind of virtual theory of international commercial arbitration. Its core content is that the legal effect of international commercial arbitral awards need not be conferred by the law of the country of arbitration, and no court in any country has the right to revoke the verdict. However, the non-domestic ruling under the New York Convention has its own specific meaning. It refers to the situation where the ruling is made in the same country as the ruling. According to local laws, the court considers that the ruling in the country of the court is not a local one, That is not a national decision. Non-domestic arbitration awards are either floating or stateless, whereas non-domestic decisions under the New York Convention are not stateless, as it is not a finding of the New York Convention that a court in a State not have the power to revoke this Rather, the courts of the ruling and enforcement countries refuse to exercise the right of avoidance on this ruling, according to local law, not to regard the ruling as a local ruling. When this ruling applies to the courts of States parties to the New York Convention other than this ruling and enforcement State for recognition and enforcement, the latter will still recognize this ruling as being “in the country of the award” under the New York Convention. Foreign ruling ". The application of the Aspulin Company to China’s court for enforcement of the ICC ruling is the ICC arbitration tribunal’s application of the ICC rule in our country’s Shanghai ruling. According to the New York Convention, this ruling is not for our country based on the current laws of our country. It is not a foreign ruling but a non-domestic ruling under the New York Convention.