论文部分内容阅读
《文物》自1994年第2期起,就吉林扶余岱吉屯等处出土的瓷器先后刊出了不同意见的多篇文章。从双方的讨论看,至少有两点共识:1.它们中的绝大多数是景德镇的产品;2.除带“至正年制”款的彩瓷碗外,其他各器都是民间窑场生产的普通日用器物。而争论的中心则在于对那些瓷器的断代。张英先生和扶余博物馆肯定它们是元瓷,并且坚持这个观点;另一方却否定这个判断,认为它们只是明代中期的产品。笔者认为后者更为接近事实。
Since the second issue of “Cultural Relics” in 1994, many articles with different opinions have been published on porcelain unearthed in Daijitun, Fuyu, Jilin Province. There are at least two consensuses from the discussions of both parties: 1. Most of them are products of Jingdezhen; 2. All the other devices except for the colorful porcelain bowl with the “Year-to-Year” models are all folk kilns Production of ordinary household utensils. The center of the controversy lies in the dating of those porcelain. Zhang Ying and Fuyu Museum affirm that they are porcelain, and adhere to this view; the other party rejected this judgment, that they are only the mid-Ming Dynasty products. I think the latter is more close to the fact.