一般都认为『史籀』就是该字书的编者,古人是以人名为篇名,故称《史籀篇》。清代段玉裁提出异议,认为许慎《说文解字·叙》『讽籀书九千字』句中的『籀』当训『读』,『讽籀连文谓讽诵』,『籀』非为人名。(段玉裁《说文·序》)王国维也怀疑『史籀』不是人名,他在《史籀篇疏证叙录》中认为《说文解字》释『籀』为『读』,又释『读』为『籀』,故『太史籀书』意为『太史读书』。《中国书法》二○○四年第二期刊载了王美盛《古 It is generally accepted that “籀 籀” is the editor of the book, and the ancients referred to the names of people as “史 籀 篇.” Duan Yu-ching raised objections in the Qing dynasty that Xu Xun’s “文 文 解 字 叙 Symphony” and “籀” Non-name. (Duan Yucai’s Shuo Wen Preface) Wang Guowei also suspected that “Shi Yu” was not a person’s name. He considered “Shuo Wen Jie Zi” as a “read” Interpretation of “read” as “籀”, so “Taishi 籀 book” means “Taishi reading.” “Chinese Calligraphy” in 2004 the second issue of Wang Mei Sheng "ancient