论文部分内容阅读
2017年1月15日,南京大学公布了《中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊和收录集刊(2017-2018)目录》,在新一期的CSSCI来源期刊和收录集刊(简称C刊)目录公布之后,一时间社会舆论激起千层浪。一些国内学者公开抨击,称C刊目录背后长期存在利益勾兑乱象,并指学术评价“异化”。中国学术期刊是否存在利益勾兑,学术界是否迷信“影响因子”的争论更是引起了社会各界的热议。采访中,湖南某高校副教授坦言,学术论文
On January 15, 2017, Nanjing University published the “Source and Periodicals of Journals of Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI)” (2017-2018). In the new issue of CSSCI Source Journals and Citation Journals After the announcement, a time public opinion provoked Melaleuca waves. Some domestic scholars openly attacked and claimed that there is a long history of confusion of interests in C catalogs and that academic evaluation is “dissimilated.” Whether the academic journals of China exists the blending of interests, whether the academic superstition or the “influence factor” debate has aroused heated debates from all walks of life. In an interview, an associate professor at a university in Hunan admitted that academic papers