本文作者意在研究后福特主义理论所引发的复杂理论和政治问题。本文不是讨论全球化与后福特理论本身,而是有关它的争论对马克思主义以及社会批判理论的影响。首先,笔者认为后福特主义的辩论具有双重性。一方面它是对马克思主义的挑战,并在一定程度可视为社会理论远离马克思主义的标志。另一方面该辩论又是恢复马克思主义的生命力和使马克思主义时代化的重要机遇。因为不仅许多辩论的问题来自马克思主义,而且新的观念很大程度上也是马克思主义在新的历史条件下的运用。其次,如果要主张处理问题后福特、我们应当明确的规范问题,在这个问题上,作者认为,面向后福特主义的社会批判理论应该把规范理论与社会结构理论结合起来,雅各·彼岱与阿克塞尔·霍耐特的理论在这方面具有特殊的重要性,但是,他们的理论也没有完全成功地实现这一目标。 The author intends to study the complex theoretical and political issues raised by the post-Fordist theory. This article does not discuss globalization and post-Ford theory as such, but rather the impact of its arguments on Marxism and critical theory of society. First of all, I believe that the post-Fordist debate has a dual nature. On the one hand, it is a challenge to Marxism and, to some extent, can be regarded as a sign that social theory is far from Marxism. On the other hand, the debate is another important opportunity to restore the vitality of Marxism and to modernize Marxism. For not only the question of many debates comes from Marxism but also the new ideas to a large extent also the application of Marxism under the new historical conditions. Secondly, if we want to advocate dealing with the issue of Ford, we should clearly regulate the issue. On this issue, the author thinks that the theory of social criticism oriented to the post-Fordism should combine the normative theory with the social structure theory, and Jacob Betty and Axelhorn’s theory is of particular importance in this regard, but their theory did not fully succeed in achieving that goal.