论文部分内容阅读
法律硕士联考在增设联考(法学)类型后,与传统的法硕联考在考试性质与功能、考试定位、考试内容等方面产生诸多矛盾,联考的类型化仅停留于形式,未能实现分类选拔的目的,亟待实质类型化处理。将联考(非法学)改造为法律职业适应性考试,检验考生是否具备从事法律职业的一般能力与潜质,联考(法学)在保持现有定位的基础上,进一步提高对法律专业能力的要求,加大应用法学的考核力度。凡法律硕士报考者,无论专业背景,须无差别地参加法律职业适应性考试,法律硕士(法学)报考者,还须加试法硕联考(法学)。积极探索将法硕联考嵌入国家统一法律职业资格制度的新路径。
After the addition of JL (Jurisprudence) type, the JMS has a lot of contradictions with the traditional Fushousai Jockey examinations in terms of the nature and function of the exam, the orientation of the exam, the content of the exam, etc. The type of the entrance exam stays in the form of failure to form To achieve the purpose of classification and selection, urgent substantive type of treatment. To change the entrance exam (illegitimacy) into a legal occupational suitability test to test whether the candidate possesses the general ability and potential to engage in legal profession. On the basis of maintaining the existing orientation, the entrance exam (law) further improves the legal professional competence , Increase the appraisal of applied law. All legal master candidates, regardless of their professional background, must be able to participate in the Legal Occupation Adaptability Test, Master of Laws (Jurisprudence) for applicants without distinction. Actively explore the Fushoush joint exam into a new national legal career qualification system of the new path.