论文部分内容阅读
目前,中日钓鱼岛争端问题日益突出,本文将针对中日钓鱼岛争端中“美国因素”进行历史探究。第二次世界大战后,美国的日本政策与钓鱼岛问题的产生、发展及其变化息息相关,密不可分。在冷战的国际背景下,美国政府依据托管琉球与“第27号令”将中国钓鱼岛正式纳入其托管之下,之后于20世纪70年代,美国将钓鱼岛的施政权“归还”日本,为中日发生钓鱼岛争端埋下了伏笔;冷战结束后,美国又在钓鱼岛主权归属问题上处于“模糊中立”;截止当今阶段,美国政府“小心翼翼”的介入中日钓鱼岛争端,持观望状态。
At present, the dispute over the Diaoyu Island between China and Japan has become increasingly prominent. This article will probe into the historical issue of “American Factor ” in the dispute over the Diaoyu Island between China and Japan. After the Second World War, the United States’ Japan policy was inextricably linked with the birth, development and changes of the Diaoyu Island issue. In the international context of the Cold War, the U.S. government formally put China’s Diaoyu Island under its custody under the “Remedies for Ryukyu” and “Order No. 27”. After that, in the 1970s, the United States “returned” its sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands to Japan, Which laid the groundwork for the dispute over the Diaoyu Island between China and Japan. After the Cold War ended, the United States was still “vaguely neutral” over the ownership of the Diaoyu Island. As of now, the U.S. government has “cautiously” involved in the dispute over the Diaoyu Island dispute between China and Japan, holding Wait and see status.