本文的目的首先是要表明,要想从同类事实证据推理得出定罪的结论,必须进行一个归纳的过程;其次是要表明,只有指出这种归纳过程的形式和衡量其根据,才能评估同类事实证据的相关性的程度。上议院于1894年对“梅金诉新南威尔士检察长”一案所作的决定中含有关于证据除外规 The purpose of this paper is, first of all, to show that in order to arrive at the conclusion of the conviction from the same type of factual reasoning, a process of induction must be carried out. Second, it is necessary to show that only by pointing out the form of the induction process and weighing its grounds, The degree of evidence relevance. The House of Lords decision in 1894 on the case of “Merkin v. New South Wales Attorney” contained a section on the exception of evidence