论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨Mcu和Tcu220两种不同功能性宫内节育器的临床效果。方法 2007年2月-2008年2月,放置Mcu功能性宫内节育器150例,放置Tcu220C宫内节育器135例,进行为期12个月的临床观察和对照分析。结果 Mcu功能性宫内节育器组脱落率、因症取出率显著低于Tcu220C宫内节育器组(P<0.05)。Mcu功能性宫内节育器组的续用率明显高于Tcu220C宫内节育器组(P<0.05)。结论 Mcu功能性宫内节育器更安全、长效、副反应小、脱落率低、续用率高。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of two different functional intrauterine devices (Mcu and Tcu220). Methods From February 2007 to February 2008, 150 cases of Mcu functional IUDs were placed and 135 cases of Tcu220C intrauterine devices were placed for clinical observation and comparative analysis for 12 months. Results Mcu functional intrauterine device group off rate, due to disease removal rate was significantly lower than Tcu220C intrauterine device group (P <0.05). The recurrence rate of Mcu functional IUD group was significantly higher than that of Tcu220C intrauterine device group (P <0.05). Conclusion Mcu functional IUDs are safer, longer lasting, with fewer side effects, lower exfoliation rate and higher follow-up rate.