论文部分内容阅读
南开大学2006年5月9日公布的一项管理意见表示,南开大学将严禁教师在未参与的研究成果中署名的行为,并明确反对盲目追求论文数量的风气。(2006年5月10日《新京报》)很多人对“不参与研究不得署名”的规定不以为然,认为规定可能流于形式,原因是很难界定“参与”一词的含义。有网友举例:导师提一个无关痛痒的意见算不算参与,出席科研开题仪式算不算参与,投稿前溜一遍又算不算参与?例子虽然有些极端,但却道出了规定缺乏操作性的弊病,这一弊病不解
According to a management opinion released on Nankai University on May 9, 2006, Nankai University will forbid teachers from using the names of non-participating research achievements and clearly opposes the blind pursuit of the number of papers. (The Beijing News, May 10, 2006) Many people disagree with the rule that “no participation in research should not be signed,” arguing that the regulation may be in the wrong form because it is difficult to define the meaning of “participation”. Some netizens for example: Tutor mentioned an irrelevant opinion is not involved, to attend the opening ceremony of scientific research is not involved, slip over again before the submission is considered participation? Although the examples are some extreme, but it lacks the provisions of the lack of operational malady This puzzles puzzled