论文部分内容阅读
随着社会经济的不断发展,对经济的研究从亚当·斯密开始,便发展成了一门系统的科学。而在后人的不断努力之下,当今经济学研究的主要进路有两条:一条是市场分析进路:一条是组织分析进路。而波斯纳把经济学的市场分析应用到了法律的有效性研究当中,形成了法律的市场分析,从而造成轰动影响,令法学界的后来者争相效仿。然而,大家却只看到了法律的市场分析的成功表象,却并有仔细去考虑导致这种成功的更深层次的原因,进而更加无法认识到,其实法律的经济分析还有另外一条理论进路,那便是法律的组织分析。而这两种经济分析对法律的有效性分析的作用是不相同的,故此,本文就根据对经济分析中的市场和组织这两条进路进行的分析比较,探讨了市场分析和组织分析在法律有效性研究中的不同作用,指出了法律的经济分析应该是在两条进路上同时进行。
With the continuous development of social economy, the study of economy started with Adam Smith and developed into a systematic science. Under the continuous efforts of future generations, there are two main approaches to the study of economics today: one is the approach of market analysis: one is the approach of organizational analysis. Posner applied the market analysis of economics to the study of the validity of law and formed a legal market analysis, which caused a sensation and impelled latercomers to emulate. However, we have only seen the successful appearance of the market analysis of law. However, we have carefully considered the deeper reasons for such success and further we can not realize that in fact, there is another theoretical approach to the economic analysis of law. That is the legal organization analysis. However, these two kinds of economic analysis do not have the same effect on the validity of law. Therefore, based on the analysis and comparison of the two approaches of market and organization in economic analysis, this paper discusses the market analysis and organizational analysis in The different roles of legal validity research indicate that the economic analysis of law should be carried out simultaneously on two approaches.