从某种角度说,旁听庭审是一种生动、形象、有效的环境公益诉讼现场培训,可以有效破解环境公益诉讼中没人诉、不愿诉、不敢诉、不会诉的问题,进而推动环境公益诉讼立案难、取证难、胜诉难三大“拦路虎”的有效解决。经过两级法院三次开庭审理,泰州市环保联合会诉6家企业的环境公益诉讼案终于尘埃落定。2014年的12月29日,江苏省高级人民法院做出终审判决:维持泰州市中级人民法院关于赔偿1.6亿余元数额的判决,常隆公司等6家企业从判决当天起30日内将赔偿款支付到泰州市环保公益金专用账户。 In some ways, listening to the hearing is a vivid, vivid and effective on-site training in environmental public interest litigation, which can effectively solve the problem of nobody complaining, reluctantly vowing and not vindicating in environmental public interest litigation, which in turn promotes Environmental public interest litigation difficult to file a case, evidence is difficult to win the three major “stumbling block” effective solution. After three court hearings at two levels, environmental protection litigation in Taizhou City Environmental Protection Association v. 6 companies finally settled the case of public interest. On December 29, 2014, Jiangsu Higher People’s Court of Final Appeal ruled in favor of upholding the judgment of Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court on the amount of compensation of more than 160 million yuan. Six enterprises, including Chang Long Company, paid the compensation within 30 days from the day of judgment To Taizhou City Environmental Protection Fund special account.