论文部分内容阅读
“逍遥”一词并非像郭、象二人解释的“自由自在”之意。《逍遥游》通篇讲无为、无用以处世。在生死观上,儒家的社会价值标准与个体生命的存在和发展相悖,庄子(道家)对个体生命则持有肯定的态度。在名利观上,立德、立功、立言是儒家的最大理想。在庄子看来,做名或利的奴隶的人根本无自由可言。在社会价值取向上,儒家主张积极入世,庄子既不主张入世,也不主张出世,而是主张游世。在精神追求方面,儒家给人的印象是谨慎小心,软弱克制。庄子则是主张通过“逍遥游”的途径,进入到“天地与我并生,而万物与我为一”的境界。以上可以看出《逍遥游》的当代价值。
“Happy ” is not the word like Guo, as the two interpret “freedom” meaning. “Happy Tour” throughout the talk about nothing, useless to life. In the view of life and death, Confucian values of social values are contrary to the existence and development of individual life. Zhuangzi (Taoism) holds a positive attitude towards individual life. In the view of fame and wealth, Lide, meritorious deeds, and righteousness are the greatest ideals of Confucianism. According to Chuang Tzu, there is no freedom at all for those who are slaves who are famous or profitable. In terms of social values, Confucianism advocates active accession to the WTO. Zhuangzi neither advocates membership of the WTO nor does it advocate the birth of the world. Instead, it advocates traveling around the world. In spiritual pursuit, Confucianism gives the impression of being cautious and weakly restrained. Zhuangzi is advocating “Happy travel ” approach, into “heaven and earth and I live, and everything is with me as one ” realm. The above can be seen that the “Happy Tour” of the contemporary value.