论文部分内容阅读
目的研究口腔修复膜材料在牙种植中引导骨再生的临床效应,为临床口腔修复膜材料的选择提供参考。方法随机抽选我院2015年9月至2016年4月期间使用可吸收的海奥修复膜实施牙种植修复手术的口腔牙齿缺失患者45例(观察组),使用不可吸收的肽膜修复膜实施牙种植修复手术的口腔牙齿缺失患者45例(对照组),比较两组患者的牙齿修复成功情况及并发症发生情况,由此判定口腔修复膜材料的临床效应。结果观察组患者术后半年的骨厚度(2.64±0.22)mm与植骨厚度(2.41±0.26)mm情况明显优于对照组患者术后半年的骨厚度(2.25±0.21)mm与植骨厚度(2.09±0.23)mm情况;观察组患者的手术成功率(95.56%)及并发症发生率(4.44%)明显优于对照组患者的手术成功率(82.22%)及并发症发生率(22.22%)(P<0.05),比较差异均具有统计学意义。结论可吸收的海奥修复膜材料比不可吸收的肽膜修复膜材料在牙种植中引导骨再生的临床效应更高,提高修复手术的成功率,促进患者骨再生并降低相关并发症的发生率,对口腔牙齿缺失患者的效益更大,值得推广应用。
Objective To study the clinical effect of oral repair membrane materials in guiding the regeneration of bone in dental implants and provide references for the choice of clinical oral repair membrane materials. Methods Forty-five patients (observation group) with oral tooth loss who underwent dental implant repair using absorbable sea omen prosthesis during our hospital from September 2015 to April 2016 were randomly selected and treated with non-absorbable peptide membrane repair Forty-five patients with dental defects who underwent dental implant surgery (control group) were enrolled in this study. The success of dental restoration and complication were compared between the two groups, and the clinical effect of oral prosthetic material was evaluated. Results The bone thickness (2.64 ± 0.22) mm and the bone thickness (2.41 ± 0.26) mm in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group at 6 months after operation (2.25 ± 0.21) mm and the thickness of the bone graft 2.09 ± 0.23) mm. Surgical success rate (95.56%) and complication rate (4.44%) in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (82.22%) and complication rate (22.22% (P <0.05), the differences were statistically significant. Conclusions Absorbable HAO repair membrane materials have higher clinical effect of inducing bone regeneration in dental implants than non-absorbable peptide membrane repair materials, improve the success rate of repair operation, promote the regeneration of patients and reduce the incidence of related complications , More effective for patients with oral tooth loss, it is worth to promote the application.