论文部分内容阅读
中法战争期间,针对法国“封禁”台湾的做法,知识分子和地方官员纷纷引用国际公法加以评析,从法理到实效,从虚封到复封,对法方滥施封港权力的殖民行径进行较为全面的批判。由于海战实力不足,清政府引入国际法的意图在于引起国际社会的同情与支持,借以维护台湾主权。在此背景下,晚清中国对外来公法的解读有其合理的一面,也难免掺杂舍此就彼、趋利避害的本地立场和自主理解。
During the Sino-French War, in response to France’s “banning” of Taiwan, intellectuals and local officials all scrutinize international public law one after another, from jurisprudence to pragmatism, from falsehood to re-closure, and over colonial acts by France over the power to impound its territory A more comprehensive critique. Due to the lack of naval strength, the intention of the Qing government to introduce international law lies in arousing the sympathy and support of the international community so as to safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty. Against this background, the interpretation of China’s public law in the late Qing dynasty has its own reasonable aspect. It is also inevitable that this interpretation should be based on the local position of seeking benefits and avoiding disadvantages and understanding autonomously.