所用对象Geenstand,一般是指人們的意識和行为所及的客体。所謂对象性Geenstndlichkeit,在馬克思的用例上,可以說是指客体的应有的状态,而这客体乃是与意識相对立的。馬克思把〈价值对象性〉作为〈使用对象性〉的对立语来使用,并且和商品的二因素(使用价值和价值)联系起来而提出这个問題。商品的〈使用价值〉的因素。是作为“使用对象”直接体現在商品体上。因此,使用对象性——作为商品使用价值的对象性——乃是“可感觉的”。但是,商品的〈价值〉,則“无論我們怎样翻閱转动一个商品”。仍是不能把握的。也就是說,商品的〈价值对象性〉“和瞿克萊夫人(Dame Qaickly)不同的,就在于我們不知道在哪里方才有它”(《資本論》第1卷第22頁)。这就表示了,商品的价值和从商 The object Geenstand, generally refers to people’s consciousness and behavior of the object. The so-called object Geenstndlichkeit, in Marx’s use case, can be said that the object should be the state, and this object is opposed to consciousness. Marx used the object of value as a countermeasure to the object of use and raised the issue with the two factors of goods (value in use and value). The “use value” of the product. Is used as “object ” directly reflected in the body of goods. Therefore, the use of objectivity - as the object of the use value of goods - is “feelable ”. However, the “value” of the product, however, “no matter how we scroll through a product.” Still can not grasp. That is to say, the difference between “object of value” and “Dame Qaickly” is that we do not know where we have it "(Capital 1, p. 22). This shows that the value of goods and from the business