本人作为强行拦车造成伤害一案被告人马光军的辩护人,在仔细研读了本案发生的原由、双方当事人的行为事实经过与后果的全部过程后,为被告人作如下辩护。 一、我的当事人马光军不构成犯罪,此事纯属意外事故。刘某提条板凳横在马路中间强行拦车,我的当事人只能下车与拦车的刘某交涉、说明不让上车的原因,以求谅解,但是原告刘某不听。面对交涉、说理无效、当时又没有交警在场的情况下,为了不影响乘客的利益和正点开车, As a defender of Ma Guangjun, the defendant in the case of forced evacuation, I carefully studied the reasons for the occurrence of this case and the defendant’s defense as follows after the entire course of the facts and consequences of both parties’ actions. First, my party Ma Guangjun does not constitute a crime, the incident is purely an accident. Liu raised a bar in the middle of the road to forcibly block the carriage, my client can only get off and stopped Ryu negotiations, indicating the reason for not allowing the car to seek understanding, but the plaintiff Liu did not listen. In the face of negotiations, reasoning is invalid, then there is no traffic police presence, in order not to affect the interests of passengers and punctuality driving,