论文部分内容阅读
在被正式确定为中国高清碟机行业推荐标准之后，EVD在随后的时间里的行走轨迹却相当的意外——EVD所面临的产业化形势不进反退。这种意外集中体现在了今典集团与阜国身上，这对EVD阵营里的昔日战友已经公然决裂：张宝全称阜国与国外公司签署股权交换协议是“卖国”的行径，而郝杰则指责张宝全“到底是谁在套钱”。在这背后所揭露的种种利益企图和几大阵营的搏弈，以及EVD标准所真正扮演的角色，完全破坏了人们对于标准的既有思维逻辑，也抹 杀了对于标准的种种期许和理想。 作为之前被认为是最有可能产业化的中国标准，EVD的前景看起来却不那么乐观。即使EVD做不成，在国家层面只不过少了几项专利；在政府层面不过多了一个没有产业化的标准；在行业层面也不过少了一个新产品；从国人层面讲也不过是多了一个做不成的中国标准。 然而真正的问题是：在未有标准之前，是否具备了标准生长的环境?一旦有了标准，又是不是按照应有的商业规则去进行这个游戏。
After being officially identified as China’s high-definition disc player industry recommended standards, EVD in the following period of time walking trajectory is quite unexpected - EVD facing the industrialization of the situation does not go back and forth. This accident was mainly embodied in the Codex Group and the Eguchi who blatantly broke away from former comrades in the EVD camp. Zhang Baoquan said that Eguchi had signed a share exchange agreement with a foreign company as a “traitor” and Hao Jie Accused Zhang Baoquan “in the end who is in a set of money.” The various interest attempts and the battles of several camps behind this and the true role played by the EVD standards completely undermine the existing logic of thinking about standards and the expectations and expectations of standards. As a Chinese standard previously thought to be the most likely industrialization, the outlook for EVD looks less optimistic. Even if the EVD fails, there are only a few patents at the national level; there is not more than one standard for industrialization at the government level; but one less new product at the industry level; but one more from the national level Chinese standards can not be done. The real question, however, is: Is there a standard environment for growth before standards are available? Once the standards are in place, do not the games go according to the business rules that they have.