晚清古文经学大师章太炎,与同时期的今文经学家在论学和个人关系方面有着错综复杂的关系,对于康有为、廖平、皮锡瑞有着不同的学术评论。他与康有为始终存在着学术上的分歧,戊戌时由于共同的政治立场,这种分歧尚未影响到二人的关系。此后随着政治上的分歧日大,二人之间的分歧最终走向了不可弥和。对于廖平和皮锡瑞,章太炎虽对他们的今文经学理论总体上持批评态度,但对于他们的学术成果亦有肯定。章太炎对今文经学者的“学术评论”已与传统的门派之争有了本质不同,这种评论与章氏政治立场的变化紧密相连,评论中也体现了章氏对处理学术“求真”与“致用”关系的原则。 Zhang Taiyan, a master of ancient scriptures in the late Qing Dynasty, had a complicated relationship with the present Wenjing scholar in both academic and personal relations. He had different academic comments on Kang Youwei, Liao Ping and Pi Xirui. There was always academic disagreement between him and Kang Youwei, and due to the common political stand during the Hundred Days of 1898, this disagreement had not affected the relationship between the two peoples. Since then, as the political differences have risen sharply, the differences between the two have finally become indelible. For Liao Ping and Pi Xirui, Zhang Taiyan, although generally critical of their theory of modern classics, has also affirmed their academic achievements. Zhang Taiyan’s “academic review” of Jin Wenjing scholars has been fundamentally different from that of the traditional martial art. Such comments are closely linked with the changes in Zhang’s political stance. Zhang’s comment also shows that Zhang’s “ Truth ”and“ use ”" the principle of relationship.