论文部分内容阅读
我国反垄断法的立法进程是一个漫长曲折的过程,然而直到法律的颁布都一直受到众多非议和质疑,十多年的总结和研究,我国的反垄断法总的来说还是成功的,但是由于国内反垄断法研究者多为法学研究者,没有系统从经济学意义理解垄断的概念,因此对于反垄断法的立法支持就偏向于接受经济学家们的经济学研究成果,从而产生的经济学盲区容易导致立法的缺陷。我国反垄断法第二条规定的反垄断法的适用主体正式本文要讨论的一个缺陷之一。通过对该问题的指出和对美国立法、文献的借鉴,提出笔者的一些建议。
However, until the promulgation of laws has been subject to many criticisms and questions over more than 10 years, the antitrust law of our country is generally successful. However, due to the fact that the antitrust law of our country is generally successful, the legislative process of antitrust law in our country is a long and tortuous process. Most of the domestic antitrust law researchers are law researchers who do not systematically understand the concept of monopoly from the perspective of economics. Therefore, the legislative support for the antitrust law tends to accept the economists’ economics research results and the resulting economics Blind areas can easily lead to legislative shortcomings. One of the shortcomings to be discussed in this paper is the applicable body of antitrust law stipulated in Article 2 of China’s Antimonopoly Law. By pointing out the problem and drawing lessons from American legislation and literature, I put forward some suggestions of the author.