论文部分内容阅读
《现代评论》在出版期间与胡适产生了一定的关系,对于这种关系长期以来存在着较大的分歧,有“创办人”、“编辑人”、“主要撰稿人”等说法,有人也曾探究过这种关系,但并未能真正的厘清。从胡适的著述、《现代评论》的创办过程和有关当事人的回忆等方面综合考察可以发现,胡适并不是《现代评论》的创办人和编辑人。他为该刊撰写的文章数量少且在该刊上所占分量较轻,就此而言,胡适仅是该刊的撰稿人而不是“主要撰稿人”。深入地研究胡适与《现代评论》的关系不仅可以澄清历史事实,也有助于我们进一步认识胡适与“现代评论派”的关系。
The Modern Comment has had a certain relationship with Hu Shi during its publication. For this long-term relationship there has been a great deal of disagreement with “founders”, “editors”, “main authors Such as saying, some people have explored this relationship, but did not really clarify. A comprehensive study of Hu Shih’s writings, the founding of Modern Commentaries and the memories of the parties involved shows that Hu Shih is not the founder and editor of Modern Review. For his part, he wrote a small number of articles and accounted for less weight in the issue. For this reason, Hu Shih was only a contributor to the magazine rather than a ”major contributor.“ A thorough study of Hu Shih’s relationship with ”Modern Criticism“ not only clarifies historical facts, but also helps us to further understand the relationship between Hu Shi and the ”Modern Criticism School."