论文部分内容阅读
在司法实践中,法律的适用主要是根据案情找法条依据,一般情况下根据案情找到的法条虽然具有个案适用性,但从法律的适用效果上来看,可能会出现法律效果与法律本身的功能与宗旨产生冲突,这种情况在现实中并不少见。法官在司法实践中如何应用和正确把握法理的作用,或者说法理在司法实践中应该发挥怎样的功能,文章从我国《刑法》第63条第2款入手,以《刑法》中的“案件特殊情况”为例,论述司法实践中审判者应如何坚持原则性和灵活性,在法律原则、法律规则和法律条文中把握审判的张力,以实现法律效果、社会效果的双优化。
In judicial practice, the application of law is mainly based on the facts of the case. Although the law found under the circumstances generally has the applicability of the case, the legal effect and the law itself may appear from the perspective of the applicable effect of the law Function and purpose conflict, this situation is not uncommon in reality. How to apply and correctly judge the role of juridical in judicial practice or how juridical should play its role in judicial practice. The article begins with Article 63, paragraph 2, of Criminal Law of our country, Special case "as an example, it discusses how judicial practitioners should adhere to principles and flexibility in judicatory practice, grasp the tension of trial in legal principles, legal rules and legal provisions in order to achieve double optimization of legal effects and social effects.