我们开关只想问这样一句话,晚近出现的这些[关于知觉]的书,就这个题目以前研究的情况来看,有没有表现什么重要的趋向呢?不出人们所料,多数论知觉的书是出自英国分析学派和受这一派影响的人的笔下的。有这个缘故,这里谈到的那些书,如果能就它们的共同背景来看,最为方便;这个背景就是这个学派在前一个时期最流行的感觉材料论。大家当还记得,咸觉材料的概念是摩尔和罗素作为一种“不可争辩的中立地带”提出来的,因为这是认识论上的实在主义者和唯心主义者都能同意的。在决定我觉察到的那片红色是一个观念还是一个物质对象之 We just want to switch the switch to these words. What has recently appeared in these books [on Perception] is that there is no significant trend toward the previous study on this subject? As no surprise, most books on perception It was written by a British analytical school and by people affected by this group. For this reason, the books referred to here are the most convenient, if at all, in their common background; this background is the most popular material-sensed material of this school during the previous period. It should be remembered that the concept of Xianjue’s material was put forward by Moore and Russell as an “indisputable neutral zone” because this is both epistemological realists and idealists can agree. In deciding what piece of red I perceive is an idea or a material object