论文部分内容阅读
我国《反垄断法》第50条规定了私人执行制度,最高人民法院《关于审理因垄断行为引发的民事纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的规定》也对该制度有原则性规定,但仍不足以使该制度有效运作,对此,应借鉴国外完善的立法经验,以惩罚性损害赔偿激励受害人提起诉讼,以集团诉讼给予受害人救济权利的程序性保障,在反垄断领域对证据制度进行特殊设计以使垄断行为的受害人能够对抗实力强大的垄断组织。
Article 50 of China’s Anti-monopoly Law stipulates a system of private enforcement. The Supreme People’s Court’s “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Dispute Cases Caused by Monopoly Actions” also provide for the principle of the system but are not sufficient This system should be operated effectively. In this regard, we should learn from the perfect foreign legislation experience, punish victims for damages by litigation to initiate litigation, give procedural safeguards for victims’ rights of remedies in class actions, and special design for evidence system in the field of antitrust So that victims of monopolies can fight powerful monopolies.